Outline

1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.

I will start with the common idea that cartoons are for kids, but that many parents are pessimistic about kid's cartoons. A growing interest in cartoons lead to studies about cartoons and kids.  And then state my thesis of my argument: "cartoons are not harmful to the developing brains of children but rather beneficial to them"

2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.

I will present some studies about children's brain development and its process. After that I'm going to show that cartoons are a popular medium of information for kids.

3. The confirmation,which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.

I will present what the head neuroscientist of Hasbro has said about cartoons and brain development and say that it(watching cartoons) is actually beneficial. Then I will say that nowadays there are a lot of parents both at work and children watching television has increased, and preventing children watching cartoons is impossible and there is no need to do so because it is actually beneficial. Cartoons are a great substitute for the lack of social interaction. Lastly, I will state that cartoons enhance imagination, creativity and sense in beauty when children watch cartoons.

4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.

I will concede that there are studies that have shown negative results about children's performance after watching cartoons. But I will refute that these experiments were not conducted with diverse children and these symptoms were temporary. There are no long-term study done about this topic and it was the fast changing scene that caused children a transitory lack of ability and not the content of the cartoon. This means that under parental guidence ( when parents regulate the amout of cartoons children watch), there are no problem of mental disorder caused by watching cartoons.

5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument, and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.

I will sum up my points said earlier, then explain how cartoons are a great way of transferring information and how it is gaining public interest nowadays. Finally, I will end by restating my original thesis.