What is my current topic?
My current topic is " We should perform autopsy without the consent of families to solve a case of a crime". I want to research about how autopsy after crimes are carried out so that I can argue that in case of a desperate lack of evidences or if the corpse may be the best evidence, it should be preserved, not cremated or buried even if the deceased wished so.
What are my guiding questions?
- Does autopsy solve crimes at all times?
- How does autopsy for evidence work in real life situations? (Autopsy VS The Deceased's wish)
- Why do people try to avoid autopsy?
What are my current thoughts?
I know that autopsies are not carried out when there isn't consent from the person themselves before they die or the person's familly. I thought about crimes that could not have been solved because the autopsy was denied. I want to persuade people to realize the importance of autopsy and change their negative thoughts about autopsy.
What is the opposition?
Common beliefs argue that you are killing the person twice and bothering the deceased from resting in peace when someone is under autopsy.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기